Category: IBL

  • BSME Mathematical Games class

    My next visit was to the BSME Mathematical Games, taught by Anna Kis, an experienced math classroom teacher who is currently earning an advanced teaching degree.

    Anna’s class was the most delightful of my visit, full of playful approaches to teaching advanced mathematical concepts to 11 or 12 year olds. After this class, I was very curious what Anna taught for the rest of the semester, since this class session was just packed with interesting ideas and approaches for the classroom.

    Anna’s lesson broke roughly into four parts: common multiples, congruence classes (mod 4), modular arithmetic, and then extensions. She made clever use of sound, color, patterns and drawings. She also created an interactive and engaging mood, and made expert use of questions. I also enjoyed having her jump outside of the lesson at times to highlight specific ideas from the practioner’s perspective.

    Multiples

    Assignment: make color overlays of the 100 chart using different colors for multiples of 3, 4, 5, and 6. Observe patterns when two overlays are superimposed. In which numbers do two given overlays coincide?

    Activity: three people repeat, “North, South, East, West” in turn. Then each person only speaks out loud when they say “North”.

    Activity: volunteers play musical instruments on every 2nd beat, 3rd beat, and 5th beat. Variation: play on 2nd, 3rd, and 6th beats.

    Discussion: what is the connection between the color overlays game and the music game?

    Anna took care not to answer questions, thus allowing students to express and explain the mathematics in their own words. They were frequently asked to explain the math as an 11 or 12 year old would, so some had to express their more sophisticated mathematical knowledge in more common terms, and others had to work to find appropriate language for their observations.

    Congruence Classes (mod 4)

    Anna drew a number line and marked off the integers from 0 to 20.

    Activity: color the multiples of 4 red.

    A natural question arose: “Should we color zero?” Anna handled this question with a question: “What is a multiple of 4?”, and elicited some student definitions. The consensus definition was then applied to zero, and it was colored red.

    Activity: color the other even numbers blue. How can we (as 11 or 12 year olds) define these numbers mathematically?

    The class definition of even numbers that are not multiples of 4 was “4 box + 2”, where “box” could be any integer.

    Question: if we color every 4th number the same color, how many colors would we need? Describe each color number.

    Congruence Arithmetic

    Anna took out some mini post-its in four colors: red, blue, yellow and green, to represent the color numbers

    Explain: yellow + green = red

    Yellow numbers are 1 more than a multiple of 4, greens are 3 more. A generic diagram of yellow + green went up on the board, and group of four dots were circled, leaving spare groups of 1 and 3, which were combined, completing a red number.

    Task: make a question for the others.

    Question: what color is 201? How do you know?

    Extensions

    Activity: Color Pascal’s Triangle with a secret rule. What is it? (It turned out to be coloring modulo 3.)

    Magic trick: three envelopes labeled 1, 2, and 3 contain numbers. A volunteer chooses two envelopes and takes a number from each and adds them. The magician, upon hearing the sum, knows which envelopes were chosen. How is this done?

    Nim Variant: a number line is drawn, and integers from 0 to 40 are marked off. Starting at 0, two players alternate advancing a pawn at least 1 and at most 4 n each turn. Whoever gets to 40 first wins.

    These further variants each opened up to congruence arithmetic ideas from earlier in the lesson, and illustrated their importance and application.

    I could imagine anything from Anna’s class fitting in very well with many US math circles I’ve seen. I would love to see approaches like this making their way into US math classrooms, and maybe BSME alumni will be the ones to do so!

     

  • A BSME school visit

    My second BSME visit was to a partner school. Every week the BSME students have a visit to one of several partner schools around Budapest. The list is very interesting, and includes many English language schools, elite specialized schools, a school for the blind, and many more.

    Visit to Petrik Lajos School
    Marcia Burrell (SUNY Oswego), Japheth Wood (Bard College), Samuel Otten (U. Missouri), and Douglas Mupasiri (U. Northern Iowa) in front of the Petrik Lajos School

    I was part of a visiting team, invited to learn about BSME, and the program arranged a special visit for us to the Petrik Lajos Bilingual Vocational School of Chemistry, Environmental Protection and Information Technology. This school was founded in 1879, so like many Hungarian schools, has an aura of tradition surrounding it. Many of Hungary’s chemists are educated and trained here. We were hosted by Márti Barbarics, who besides teaching math, is working towards a doctorate in math education.

    Márta is piloting a problem-based math curriculum that seeks to actively engage students. This is a curriculum that is based on the Pósa Method, a project that is led by Péter Juhász, another BSME instructor (more on that in a later post). Márta described the project as quite an innovation, as compared to the traditional curriculum.

    This was a curious fact, in light of Hungary’s fame and tradition in using problem solving to nurture the mathematical interest and expertise of some of the world’s most famous mathematicians and scientists! In fact, many in the US math circle movement trace the origins of math circle back to Hungary (http://mathcircle.berkeley.edu/program) while others point to Bulgaria, Romania and Russia.

    Much of the problem solving method that have had a huge impact on US math education in past decades (and problem solving was quite fashionable, for a time) is encapsulated in George Pólya’s 1945 book, How To Solve It (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_to_Solve_It).

    Pólya (http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Polya.html) ended up at Stanford University. You might be interested in the Stanford Mathematics Problem Book (https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/The_Stanford_Mathematics_Problem_Book.html), or in that the Stanford Math Circle (http://mathcircle.stanford.edu) was founded in 2005.

    As another sidetrack, one of Pólya’s most famous talks is, “Let us teach guessing”, and you might be able to find the video online. The workshops at HCSSiM start off with this exploration, called “The Watermelon Problem”, and I’ve find that it is a wonderful way to get the conversation started. [I also found out this fall from a delightful math seminar talk at Bard College, delivered by Moshe Cohen of Vassar, that this problem appeared in print as, “Cutting the cheese”, by J.L. Woodbridge, as problem E554 in the 1943 American Math Monthly.]

    Back to the visit to the Petrik Lajos School, Márta had prepared a logic lesson for her students, based on some of Raymond Smullyan’s Knights and Knaves problems (in What is the Name of This Book?) She met with us before the lesson and described her students and her concerns that they might be hesitant toward the lesson, as it differently from the typical lecture mode of delivery. She was ready to explain that logic problems really do appear on the standardized exams, which they might find motivating. Also, Petrik Lajos is a dual language school, so the class would be taught in English.

    Márta was partially right! The students did ask those classic questions, like, “will this be on the test?” But soon they were captured by the beautiful problems, and quite engaged. Márta’s students seemed to enjoy discussing each problem, and how to resolve them.

    That’s part of the point. Students get engrossed by these delightful problems, and become open to genuinely learning the mathematics underneath, and really internalize the content. When skillfully used, an experienced math instructor can select and sequence good problems into an effective and enjoyable math course.

    The Hungarian tradition in mathematical problem solving is now in the process of being rolled out to a wider high school audience, complete with educational studies of efficacy.

    I liked what I saw at Petrik Lajos, but was curious to visit more Hungarian math classrooms. In later posts, I’ll write about more experiences I had with BSME classrooms, and two other school visits I was able to arrange independently of BSME.

     

     

     

  • BSME Directed Research on Gender Issues

    I visited the Budapest Semester in Math Education program in October, 2017, and I’ve been eager to share my notes.

    I really like the program, and think that it can be an impactful experience for future math teachers. Especially for those with a very strong math background. For example, junior staff in the HCSSiM program who’d like to explore teaching, would benefit very much.

    The program is still small, but primed to expand quickly, once it becomes better known.

    My first stop in BSME was to Fruzsina Kollányi’s seminar style directed research workshop on gender issues in math education. This workshop is new to BSME, so let’s call it a pilot class.

    The BSME students were researching the gender achievement gap in Hungarian high schools (they call these “gimnázium”), and Fruzsina had arranged for them to have access to testing data from several specialized schools from around the country. The focus of the investigation would be on Hungary’s highest performing students.

    I was able to point them towards similar research from the US:

    The Gender Gap in Secondary School Mathematics at High Achievement Levels: Evidence from the American Mathematics Competitions
    by Glenn Ellison and Ashley Swanson

    https://economics.mit.edu/files/7598

    The BSME students spent most of the class time designing a survey that they planned to sent out to math teachers and math students. The discussion focused on the logistics and design of the survey. I was glad that they were taking on the details head-on, and that everyone was able to contribute ideas to improve the survey process.

    What made Fruzsina’s course real for me was that the students planned to present their findings at a Hungarian Math Education conference later in the semester. They were preparing to submit an abstract, and would soon be working under a deadline to complete their research study and to prepare their presentation.

    Some more information on the instructor: like most BSME instructors, Fruzsina Kollányi is deeply involved in math education in several ways. She’s a high school math teacher at the Budapest Contemporary Dance Academy, an instructor at Skool (http://skool.org.hu/en/, something akin to Girls Who Code), and educates underserved Roma kids with BAGázs (http://www.bagazs.org/en/).

    UPDATE: Fruzsi shared a link to her students’ presentation: https://prezi.com/view/hMv9jqgiqovge3UKgMEu/

    A Prezi! Here’s another great Hungarian invention, an interactive and intuitive graphical way to organize a presentation.

    Also, she plans to investigate assessment and gamification of learning in future seminars.

    By the way, my favorite math websites that make use of gamification are expii.org, artofproblemsolving.com, and brilliant.org. I’ve also become a big fan of Duolingo, which is a language learning site. Do you have a favorite gamification way to learn math?

  • Difficulties in Logic

    I gave my math students a Surprise Formative Assessment today. This was a quick check of their retention of a definition, and facility at forming the negation of a statement.

    Everyone did okay on the definition – it’s important to know precisely what things mean.

    The results of the negation exercise showed three areas that are slowing our progress through the IBL notes. I identify them here, and I’d love for my students to discuss them with each other in study groups, on the subway, in office hours, etc.

    First, expressing and identifying universal and existential quantifiers in informal but precise English usage. Many statements we use in mathematics state that some property is ALWAYS TRUE for EVERY object in a class of objects. These are universally quantified statements. Others state that THERE EXISTS at least one object from a class of objects for which some property holds. These are existentially quantified statements. It must be clear from your mathematical writing which sort of statement you mean!

    Second, the skill of correctly NEGATING a quantified statement. If a statement is NOT ALWAYS true, then THERE EXISTS an object for which the statement is false; a counterexample. Likewise, if THERE DOES NOT EXIST an object about which a statement is true, then the statement is false FOR EVERY OBJECT.

    Third, in a statement that involves multiple and nested quantifiers, there is something interesting and useful that happens when you negate it. We saw this today when negating the statement that “Sequence p_1, p_2, … converges to point x”, which is triply-quantified. Here it is, with parentheses to emphasize the scope of the quantifiers.

    FOR ALL open intervals S that include x, (THERE EXISTS a positive integer N, so that (FOR ALL integers n that are at least N, (p_n is in S.)))

    This has the format FOR ALL(THERE EXISTS(FOR ALL(statement))). When you negate it, it becomes: THERE EXISTS(FOR ALL(THERE EXISTS(negation of statement))).

    That is,

    THERE EXISTS an open interval S that includes x for which (THERE DOES NOT EXIST a positive integer N, for which (FOR ALL integers n that are at least N, (p_n is in S.)))

    We can move the negation further across the quantifiers:

    THERE EXISTS an open interval S that includes x so that (WHENEVER N is a positive integer, then it’s not true that (FOR ALL integers n that are at least N, (p_n is in S.)))

    pushing the negation along even further:

    THERE EXISTS an open interval S that includes x so that (WHENEVER N is a positive integer, THERE EXISTS some integer n that’s at least as big as N, for which (p_n is NOT in S.)))

    This last form is the most useful when crafting a proof by contradiction. If you assume that the sequence p_1, p_2, … does not converge to the point x, then you can immediately assume this special open interval S with some amazing special properties.

    For further background on negating statements, I recommend “The Nuts and Bolts of Proof” by Antonella Cupillari, which has a nice section entitled “How to Construct the Negation of a Statement”.

  • Creativity in Mathematics: Inquiry-Based Learning and the Moore Method

    I just viewed the recent video on the Modified Moore Method (MMO), also known as Inquiry Based Learning (IBL).

    Creativity in Mathematics: Inquiry-Based Learning and the Moore Method

    This video features interviews with MMO practitioners, researchers and students. I’ve had the pleasure of meeting many of them at various Legacy of R. L. Moore, which have been a lot of fun.

    I’ve been developing an approach to IBL in my own teaching, especially in combination with cooperative learning, and have at various times tried to write my own problem sequences. Not an easy task, but very worthwhile!